Shortcuts

WHO Early 2020 Data Sweden & Belarus PCR Test Vaccines

Introduction

Where to begin with Covid? Unfortunately, due to massive propaganda we have to start with the very basics question of “What is life?”

Core properties of life are “growth, change, reproduction, active resistance to external perturbation, and evolution”[1]


Let us first take a look at “active resistance to external perturbation”. This includes fighting against infections from bacteria and viruses. Life is a collection of self-replicating and self-protecting molecules. If they fail to do that than they will die. Only successful collections of molecules survive. The process of multiplying successful molecules, while others die is called evolution.


If you claim only vaccines can fight against Covid then you also imply that our bodies stopped showing a core property of life.


Non lifeforms like a car will not try to fight by itself against external perturbations like rusting. It relies on a person to apply a protective layer over the steel and renew it in case it comes off.


How does Covid impact growth, change and reproduction?


For humans, the reproductive age is between the early teens until around forty for woman. Men start a little later, but do not reach a clear point of infertility as they age. Usually though their active reproductive period matches the woman’s. Due to this biological limit the value of living beyond 50 years drops significantly. At this age humans are not reproducing anymore and they already had 10 years of teaching their youngest children life skills (if they had them at the age of 40). Teenagers learn more how they fit into society than into a family.


If reproduction starts in late teens/early twenties humans can still survive (maybe not thrive) with 40 years of life expectancy. How does this compare with Covid death?


Figure 1: USA Covid Death and Total Death

As seen in Figure 1, elderly are particularly vulnerable, however young people are even less likely to die from covid than regular flu viruses. Covid might actually be better than the regular flu.


A softer definition is quality years lost. That means years left until the average age of death. Someone dying at 78 in a country with a mean of 80 loses two years. Someone dying at 82 does not lose any quality years at all. So even by the softer definition Covid has only a small impact. The vast majority of deaths are retired people living at home or in a care home.


From the definitions of life, we can conclude the most devastating age for death is teens and twentieths. This age group received significant emotional and financial resources from their parents and society and having them dying without offspring is devastating. For this reason, we perceive war, school shootings and terrorist attacks as so dramatic. It is no coincidence that terrorists do not targeted elderly care homes. The potential damage to a society is very minor.


WHO guideline change


Under the WHO pandemic definition (changed in 2007) a pandemic requires just an epidemic over a large area affecting a large number of people. [2]


Under this definition every flu season is a pandemic and we had one every single year at least since humans lived in dense farming communities. There is nothing in the definition about immunity or disease severity.


A redefinition of pandemic does not qualify for suspending human rights. The new word pandemic has nothing to do with the wording of public health as the writers of previous laws intended.


Early Korean data


Before western countries started to lock down, March figures from East Asian countries like Korea already showed that there is no concern for the majority of people or the society as a whole. It is very likely that the ruling elite just saw this as an opportunity to enact their agenda 2030: The Great Reset. We look at it later in more detail.


2020 March 24 figures (South Korea)[3]

8961 cases (51 million population)
111 deaths (1.2%)
3166 fully recovered
20% of cases show no symptoms at all

Death rate for different age groups 80+: 11.6%
70s: 6.3%
60s: 1.5%
50s: 0.4%
40s: one death
30s: one death
under 30: no death
90% of all deaths are over 60 (mostly retirees)


The doctor presenting the figures said without a vaccine or medication only the immune system can fight against the virus. Today however only a vaccine is accepted by politicians / pharma industry.


Sweden and Belarus (Countries opposing Lockdowns)


Sweden did not enact any lockdown or mask mandate. They do not have a higher death toll than countries with abusive governments.


Figure 2: Predicted Covid deaths in Sweden vs actual deaths

Belarus went even further that Sweden. At the start of May at a time when other countries went into lockdown Belarus held a World War II victory parade. People were standing shoulder to shoulder, young and old, often without a mask. This is true real-life proximity and not a statistical artifact like inhabitants per square meter. This metric was used as a justification of why certain cities like New York showed a far higher death rate than other cities and rural areas. Now we know that most early deaths in New York were caused by a policy of sending recovered covid patients into nursing homes. This false claim was a contributor to the 2m social distancing rule.


Did Belarus collapse as a result of their blatant disregard of our covid rules? No! They are doing the same or better than western countries. They have a lower deathrate per capita than the United Kingdom which had lockdowns, mask mandates and social distancing.


The following paragraphs are excerpts from the off guardian [4]


Overall, the Belarussian approach has been the least authoritarian in Europe. Belarussian football went ahead as normal and fans were allowed to continue attending games. Theatres, cafes and other social events continued and there was no shutdown of the economy. Victory Day Parades also went ahead on the 9th May despite being cancelled in countries such as Russia. Neither did Lukashenka delay scheduled elections, unlike Jacinda Ardern of New Zealand.


According to the official narrative, Belarus should have been a zone of death, destruction and disaster. Neil Ferguson’s modelling – one of the key pieces of propaganda used to put Britain in lockdown – predicted that left unchecked Covid 19 would kill between 54,090 and 71,616 Belarussians.


The population of Belarus is around 9.5million. Of this population, as of December 12, 2020, a total of 1,263 deaths are recorded as being from Covid 19. It appears the first death in Belarus attributed to this disease


It goes without saying that 1,263 deaths out of a population of 9.5m is minuscule and hardly indicative of a deadly pandemic sweeping the country. But critics of the Belarussian approach may claim that Lukashenka is hiding the reality of Covid 19 deaths in the country.


According to the data, there were some excess deaths in Belarus in the second quarter of 2020 (April, May and June). 35,858 died in Belarus during this period, 5606 higher than in 2019. Examining the data, we can see that the vast majority of these excess deaths were in June, with virtually none in April and a small excess in May.


BELARUS VS ENGLAND AND WALES


This analysis was performed by taking the number of excess deaths for Belarus and then calculating the same figures for England and Wales from the weekly death data from 2019 and 2020. Belarus had 5605 excess deaths in April, May and June 2020 from a population of 9.5 million. England and Wales had 54,798 excess deaths in the same period from a population of 59.5 million.


The population of England and Wales is 6.26 times larger than that of Belarus, so dividing the 54,798 figure by 6.26 gives a result of 8754. If Belarus had the same excess death rate as England and Wales another 3,149 deaths in Belarus would have been observed. Or to phrase this data another way, if England and Wales had the same excess death rate as Belarus, there would have been 19,711 fewer deaths over the period.


Given the cost to the economy and mental wellbeing of imposing lockdowns, as well as the draconian restrictions on basic liberties, these facts strongly suggest that leaders that did impose lockdowns have a case to answer from their citizens


PCR Test


The PCR test is perfect for manipulating case numbers. If you set the numbers of cycles high enough you can get a positive test result for nearly everything. Any contamination will give you a positive result.
The same person can also test positive and negative at the same time.[5]


Virus DNA in humans is far too small to be detected by any machine we currently have. However, if you multiply their DNA (or part of it) by several orders of magnitude, we can detect it. One such method is polymerase chain reaction (PCR).


The main result of a PCR test is the number of cycles it took to detect a DNA sample. It has exponential growth. The number of samples nearly doubling with every cycle until the carrier are all used up (usually cycle 35). The test doesn’t give a positive or negative result. It gives the number cycles needed for detection or a complete failure of detecting anything. At over 30 cycles basically any contamination can give a positive test result. Nowhere near enough to count as infected. Studies suggested a 97% false positive rate for European tests.[6][7]


The earliest detections of the covid virus occur at a cycle threshold (CT value) of 11. The majority of infected have a CT value of 17-25.


Figure 3: Quantity of samples with an increase of 1.9x per cycle.

If your PCR test device has a detection threshold of 10 billion samples. How many samples do you have to start with to detect anything?

Figure 4: Shows what the original quantities of DNA samples are needed to reach a one billion sample detection threshold


Since every country and sometimes even lab differs in how cases are recorded all PCR cases can be completely dismissed as worthless. Actually, less than worthless. Just a tool to confuse and spread misinformation.


What really counts are total deathrates regardless of cause, at least in countries without lockdown measures, mask mandates or other restrictions. These measures introduce high stress, mental health issues or even restrict access to regular health care and cause additional death.


Overall, 2020 was just a strong flu season nothing more. Exactly matching the WHO redefinition of pandemic. Every flu season is a pandemic. The following charts show more evidence that governments don't control viruses and covid isn't a pandemic by any historic definition.[8]


Figure 5: Ireland Deathrates by age group


Office for National Statistics (ONS, England) [12]

The total deaths has been rising steadily in England over the last few years. Small ups and downs in the deathrate show the natural variations between strong and weak flu seasons. By just looking at this graph no one would suspect a new deadly virus. The years 2018, 2019, 2020 have the same shape and magnitude as the years 2013, 2014, 2015. The only difference in 2020 is a global fear campaign.


Government propaganda


The Government claims to protect us from Covid, but also controls our perception of how dangerous Covid is. The result is they can do as ever they please. This is the same structure as religions. The Christian Church tells you are born with sins and naturally go to hell, but luckily if you follow their commands your soul will be saved and you go to heaven.

A detailed analysis of this group behaviour is in the article "Evolution of Religion"

Vaccines


Some Basics:


https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/imz-basics.htm

A vaccine only stimulates a person’s immune system. It is not required or the only way for the immune system to produce immunity. Since people below 50 have a lower chance of death from Covid than regular daily activities there is no point requiring vaccination of young people(a large percentage shows no symptoms at all). Since the PCR test so flawed it is not hard to produce any outcome you want in your statistics about vaccine effectiveness. Simply set the number of cycles for vaccinated as very low and then they never had covid. For the unvaccinated you set the number of cycles very high and get a huge false positive rate, which is interpreted as high vaccine effectiveness.


Covid viruses attack the body by attaching themselves to cells over a spike protein. Kind of like a spacecraft attaches itself to a space station over a docking port. Once connected material can move between the two.


Traditional vaccines employ an “attenuated antigen response”. They inject an altered, less harmful virus into a person body so the immune system can build antibodies without suffering the consequences of a fully potent virus. Covid19 vaccines contain messenger RNA (mRNA) which forces your cells to produce spike proteins with the same signature as the Covid19 virus. The body’s immune system then recognises this spike protein and reacts against it. However, corona viruses mutate quickly. If the shape of the spike protein changes then the vaccine becomes useless. Your immune system was only trained to react towards one particular protein and not the virus itself. You might need a new vaccine every single year, an endless income stream for the pharma industry and even more control by government / corporations.[9]


There has never been a successful vaccine against corona viruses nor long-term studies of mRNA vaccines. The vaccines only got experimental or emergency approval by health agencies. Countries like the UK granted complete immunity from civil liability to manufactures/administers if the vaccine harms a person. In other words, with vaccines, you can commit murder without being persecuted.[10]


For three deaths prevented by vaccination we have to accept two inflicted by vaccination. The cost per life saved (a few months for most cases) is ludicrous.[11]



Vaccines are not free!

There is no such thing as free in a market economy. Someone has to pay for it directly or indirectly. Let's assume the government doesn't increase taxes and simply prints money to pay the pharma industry. Now the owners of the pharma companies have several billions of dollars they can bid on products against you. They won't use it on consumables like toast or milk in the local supermarket, but on assets like other company shares and the property market. If your local milk producer wants to buy a house he has to pay significantly more for it to outbid the pharma owners. So in the end he has to raise the price of milk. If he doesn't buy a house and chooses to rent a pharma owned property he now has to follow their house rules. Either way the pharma owners gained a significant amount of power.

Origins of the Virus


It’s basically confirmed that the virus came out of the Wuhan lab. They specialized in corona virus research and collected different viruses from across the country to do research on them.


As of 2021 it doesn’t matter where the virus comes from, if it was man-made or if it was released intentional. The biggest concern is the mentally insane response of governments and corporations.


The Great Reset


It is certain that all corporate and governmental coverage of Covid is just a show to enact more control over all aspects of your life. It is impossible for all the scientific fraud and government mismanagement to be simply incompetence or stupidity. There are too many cases in too many countries of the world.


The most public organisation with this goal is the World Economic Forum with its Great Reset agenda. As with all religions they claim to simply protect us from invisible dangers, but all they want to do is control our life.


It will result in a new Dark Age like when Europe was controlled by the Catholic Church. Unfortunately, this time it will be worse because they control almost the entire world and technology progress allowed 24/7 mass surveillance. The only way out then is a collapse of the system. Most likely some groups will completely break off, form their own societies and grow from there. If this is brutally suppressed, then maybe over time people will become too stupid or disengaged to maintain the surveillance system.


Similar great content

Covid from a Psycholoical Perspectve
Ivor Cummins presents the data that matters instead of spreading fear
Comedy about corporate media

References

[1] Britannica
[2] https://www.publichealth.com.ng/world-health-organization-who-pandemic-definition/ [3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gAk7aX5hksU [4] https://off-guardian.org/2020/12/19/how-belarus-exposes-the-lockdown-lie/ [5] https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1327125840040169472?s=20 [6] https://rightsfreedoms.wordpress.com/2021/05/10/cdc-specifies-pcr-test-cycle-threshold-for-vaccinated-individuals-what-does-this-mean/ [7] https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/72/11/e921/5912603 [8] https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/narrative-lockdowns-and-masks-fails-yet-again [9] https://principia-scientific.com/covid-vaccinated-can-shed-spike-protein-harming-unvaccinated/ [10] https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2012/1916/regulation/345/2020-11-06 [11] https://thefatemperor.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/The-Safety-of-COVID-19-Vaccinations%E2%80%94We-Should-Rethink-the-Policy.pdf [12] https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationestimates/bulletins/annualmidyearpopulationestimates/latest#natural-change-in-the-uk-population